Introduction

Matthew 23:16–22 ESV
16 “Woe to you, blind guides, who say, ‘If anyone swears by the temple, it is nothing, but if anyone swears by the gold of the temple, he is bound by his oath.’  17 You blind fools! For which is greater, the gold or the temple that has made the gold sacred?  18 And you say, ‘If anyone swears by the altar, it is nothing, but if anyone swears by the gift that is on the altar, he is bound by his oath.’  19 You blind men! For which is greater, the gift or the altar that makes the gift sacred?  20 So whoever swears by the altar swears by it and by everything on it.  21 And whoever swears by the temple swears by it and by him who dwells in it.  22 And whoever swears by heaven swears by the throne of God and by him who sits upon it.

Recap

Without taking a lot of time on a recap, here is the basic context we’re in. Standing in contrast to the 7 beatitudes in Matthew 5, we have here the 7 woes or curses of Christ.
As Christians, we believe every word of the book. 2 Timothy 3:16

2 Timothy 3:16 ESV
16 All Scripture is breathed out by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness,

Note the emphasis on the word ’all’ here. Not some of the scripture but all of the scripture. As Christians who belong to the reformed camp, we must not forget that Sola Scripture doesn’t just mean that Scripture forms the foundational grounds for all our beliefs, but that every part of Scripture holds equal authority in serving us with such solid grounds.
Therefore, we don’t get to pick and choose verses that most suit us. We ought not to meditate on the beatitudes at the cost of the woes or vice versa.

Theological Deficiencies

In this present age, Christians broadly suffer from two illnesses. They suffer from two theological deficiencies.

a. The lack of logic
b. The lack of categories

And these deficiencies cannot be mitigated by a dump of facts. They are problems in the way of thinking and in the approach to reasoning. Much of the labour of the preachers and teachers of this church is not merely to lecture in facts (though we do a lot of that); but is a training in thinking, in forming the Christian worldview.
An example of this lack can be seen in many Christian’s inability to harmonise the beatitudes and the woes. I know of families that read through the Psalms but avoid reading those imprecatory Psalms as though David was suddenly possessed by the strange mean spirit of the God of the Old Testament.
Not only can they not logically harmonise these texts, but they also lack the categories to do so. In a time so full of grace and mercy, they don’t know what to do with judgment. Or even how it factors in.
So, they courteously apologise for David’s shenanigans and Christ’s tantrums, and move on to brighter passages. But these are neither shenanigans nor tantrums – they’re profitable for teaching, corrections and training in righteousness.

You are not children

One of the things that was recently brought to my attention, especially when preaching on the subject of satire and sarcasm, much of which Jesus uses in this chapter, was that people may not be wise in the way they employ their sarcasm. I believe one or two of the questions after some of those sermons may reveal the same concern. So, I think it is only reasonable that I address this concern.
Let us say I preach a sermon on loving your children, would we be equally concerned about whether parents might be unwise in their loving, that they might emotionally smother their children at the cost of discipleship?
Or if I preach a sermon on disciplining children, encouraging that we do not spare the rod, as it is written in Proverbs 13:24

Proverbs 13:24 ESV
24 Whoever spares the rod hates his son, but he who loves him is diligent to discipline him.

Would we be equally concerned that maybe parents would not be wise in the judicial use of the rod?
The point here is that you can preach about any virtue or discipline and the people can be unwise in their use of it.
When I say that watching movies, in and of itself, is not sinful, I am not saying that you cannot sin by watching movies.
For example, when Paul addresses the issue of eating vegetarian and non-vegetarian food, he concludes by leaving it to the conscience of the individual when he says in Romans 14:23
Romans 14:23 ESV
23 But whoever has doubts is condemned if he eats, because the eating is not from faith. For whatever does not proceed from faith is a sin.

But it is not as though Paul did not make his position clear.
Paul teaches authoritatively that eating non-veg is not sinful.

Romans 14:14 ESV
14 I know and am persuaded in the Lord Jesus that nothing is unclean in itself, but it is unclean for anyone who thinks it unclean.

In fact, he addresses the one who eats meat as having the stronger faith.
Romans 14:2 ESV
2 One person believes he may eat anything, while the weak person eats only vegetables.

So, if eating non-veg is in and of itself not sinful, one can still sin by eating non-veg. And he can sin in multiple ways – gluttony, idolatry and breach of conscience.
In much the same way, watching movies is in and of itself not sinful, but one can sin by watching movies in multiple ways – binging without control, idolatry and breach of conscience.
Therefore, the point remains that you can preach about anything under the sun, and people can misuse it. So, what do you do?
What do you do when you have a diverse audience? Of strong and weaker brothers, of the mature and the immature, of older and younger people.

I will give you three pointers on how I approach this.
i. I do not preach for the lowest common denominator.
ii. I do not preach for the highest common factor.
iii. And that leaves the general average of the adults in this room. So, here is my exhortation to most of you.

You are not children. And you shouldn’t be receiving any of this with childish thinking. 1 Corinthians 14:20
1 Corinthians 14:20 ESV
20 Brothers, do not be children in your thinking. Be infants in evil, but in your thinking be mature.

And parents, it is your adult maturity that must nurture and train your children in the hearing of every sermon.
Because, no matter how much you try to qualify and justify the truth and safeguard people from error, the indulgent or the ignorant will always devise a method to err. It is the innate talent of the flesh.
Whether genuinely or negligently, we are prone to err.

Exegesis

Matthew 23:16 ESV
16 “Woe to you, blind guides, who say, ‘If anyone swears by the temple, it is nothing, but if anyone swears by the gold of the temple, he is bound by his oath.’

In this round of woes, we have Jesus addressing the subject of oaths. And we know from the Sermon on the Mount that Jesus taught us saying,
Matthew 5:33–37 ESV
33 “Again you have heard that it was said to those of old, ‘You shall not swear falsely, but shall perform to the Lord what you have sworn.’  34 But I say to you, Do not take an oath at all, either by heaven, for it is the throne of God,  35 or by the earth, for it is his footstool, or by Jerusalem, for it is the city of the great King.  36 And do not take an oath by your head, for you cannot make one hair white or black.  37 Let what you say be simply ‘Yes’ or ‘No’; anything more than this comes from evil.

And we read in James 5:12
James 5:12 ESV
12 But above all, my brothers, do not swear, either by heaven or by earth or by any other oath, but let your “yes” be yes and your “no” be no, so that you may not fall under condemnation.

Now, the first question is if the New Testament prohibits us from taking an oath. These verses from Matthew and James seem to suggest that, so maybe we should hang our coats and call it a day.
Well, it’s not that simple. One reason is that oaths taken in the name of the Lord are a provision that the Lord himself instituted. Do you know that God has vowed by his name? The Bible is full of oaths or vows.

Numbers 30:2 ESV
2 If a man vows a vow to the Lord, or swears an oath to bind himself by a pledge, he shall not break his word. He shall do according to all that proceeds out of his mouth.

Deuteronomy 23:21 ESV
21 “If you make a vow to the Lord your God, you shall not delay fulfilling it, for the Lord your God will surely require it of you, and you will be guilty of sin.

Ecclesiastes 5:4–5 ESV
4 When you vow a vow to God, do not delay paying it, for he has no pleasure in fools. Pay what you vow.  5 It is better that you should not vow than that you should vow and not pay.

Leviticus 19:12 ESV
12 You shall not swear by my name falsely, and so profane the name of your God: I am the Lord.

Making oaths or vows were a normative provision in the Old Testament.

Definitions

This leads us to ask the question then – ‘What is a vow or an oath?’
The author of Hebrews tells us in Hebrews 6:16
Hebrews 6:16 ESV
16 For people swear by something greater than themselves, and in all their disputes an oath is final for confirmation.

An oath was a way for people to bind themselves to their word till it was fulfilled. And for that they invoked the name of something greater than themselves.
And so when they would invoke the name of the Lord when making an oath, it was the highest form of seriousness conveyed and the Lord would require that of him by law.

What about the NT?

Now, some might argue that making oaths was a provision of the Old Testament and is no longer applicable in the NT since Jesus now forbids it.
But that is not true either. Since Paul in several places invokes the presence of God or the witness of the Holy Spirit as a way to justify his authority.

Romans 9:1 ESV
1 I am speaking the truth in Christ—I am not lying; my conscience bears me witness in the Holy Spirit—

2 Corinthians 1:23 ESV
23 But I call God to witness against me—it was to spare you that I refrained from coming again to Corinth.

Or when Jesus in multiple places says, ‘Truly, truly…’ Why would Jesus say that? Is it because the statements that follow this phrase are more true than his other statements? John MacArthur talks about Jesus’ use of the phrase ‘truly, truly’ as a form of vow or oath.
Though all of Jesus’s words are equally true and abiding, the oaths help add emphasis and assurance to the listener.
And above all this stands the fact that God himself is an oath maker.

Hebrews 6:13–18 ESV
13 For when God made a promise to Abraham, since he had no one greater by whom to swear, he swore by himself,  14 saying, “Surely I will bless you and multiply you.”  15 And thus Abraham, having patiently waited, obtained the promise.  16 For people swear by something greater than themselves, and in all their disputes an oath is final for confirmation.  17 So when God desired to show more convincingly to the heirs of the promise the unchangeable character of his purpose, he guaranteed it with an oath,  18 so that by two unchangeable things, in which it is impossible for God to lie, we who have fled for refuge might have strong encouragement to hold fast to the hope set before us.

  • Did you catch that? God desired to show more convincingly the unchangeable character of his purpose to the heirs and so for their sake, he guaranteed it with an oath.

Acts 2:30 ESV
30 Being therefore a prophet, and knowing that God had sworn with an oath to him that he would set one of his descendants on his throne,

Therefore, a biblical survey on the subject of oaths and vows reveals the righteous use and purpose of it as a provision that God has given.
Then, why do Jesus and James ask us not to make vows? We studied this passage in Matthew 5 in 2020, and that sermon on ‘Oaths’ is available on our YouTube channel if you want to listen to it.
But the summary of what Jesus and James appear to be addressing is the hypocrisy of the Pharisees and Scribes. You see, these Jewish leaders weren’t teaching the congregation all the vile and deplorable doctrines.
No, the issue here is hypocrisy. The issue here is that they teach some truth in such a way as to hide their lies behind it.
They forbid murder to hide hatred toward their brother behind it. They forbid adultery to hide lusting after a woman behind it.
Our sinful nature has mastered the art of using truth as a disguise for lies. It’s like using a fancy curtain to cover a messy room or a fake plant to hide the fact that you can’t keep anything alive.
That winsome smile that covers bitterness or handshakes that are a covert art at backstabbing.
We pray publicly to cover the lack of it privately. We make sure our humility is noticed so that we may be praised for it.
I could keep going on.
Therefore, the hypocrisy of the Pharisees could be seen in the fact that they emphasised oath-keeping to excuse themselves from not keeping their word as long as it was not a vow.
Given this context, when Jesus says in Matthew 5:37
Matthew 5:37 ESV
37 Let what you say be simply ‘Yes’ or ‘No’; anything more than this comes from evil.

He is drawing emphasis on the fact that God holds men accountable for every loose word and not just vows, just as hating your brother is akin to murder or lusting after a woman in the mind is the adultery of the heart.
Jesus and James are not saying that as long as you don’t make vows you don’t have to take your words seriously. No, they’re meaning it the other way around. That you don’t have to make these hypocritical oaths since your regular ‘yes’ and ‘no’ will be judged.

Back to Exegesis

Matthew 23:16 ESV
16 “Woe to you, blind guides, who say, ‘If anyone swears by the temple, it is nothing, but if anyone swears by the gold of the temple, he is bound by his oath.’

We see here in this passage how far their hypocrisy goes. Do you see their nuancing of oathkeeping?
If anyone swears by the temple, it is nothing! If anyone swears by the gold of the temple, he is bound by his oath.
By doing this, they are twisting the law in order to suit their hypocrisies. This is what the hypocrite does to biblical doctrine.
Legalism is not the heresy of those prone to be more biblical. It is the heresy of the hypocrite. When I see a legalist, I’m keen to see what lies behind the legalism.

Matthew 23:17 ESV
17 You blind fools! For which is greater, the gold or the temple that has made the gold sacred?

The danger of hypocrisy is not just in the fact that they twist doctrine, but in the fact that that twisting often compromises the more important matters of the law. More of this we will see in the next sermon.
Here by emphasising the gold in the temple, they were disregarding what was greater, the temple.

Matthew 23:18–19 ESV
18 And you say, ‘If anyone swears by the altar, it is nothing, but if anyone swears by the gift that is on the altar, he is bound by his oath.’  19 You blind men! For which is greater, the gift or the altar that makes the gift sacred?

The same goes for the altar and the gift that is offered on the altar.
By twisting emphasis their teaching was not sanctifying, but a sacrilege.

Matthew 23:20–22 ESV
20 So whoever swears by the altar swears by it and by everything on it.  21 And whoever swears by the temple swears by it and by him who dwells in it.  22 And whoever swears by heaven swears by the throne of God and by him who sits upon it.

So, if you’re going to make a vow, make it properly. Get your doctrine straight and keep it all the way. And know that God holds all your words accountable.

The Satire

Thrice Jesus calls them names!
You blind guides, blind fools and blind men!
And each of these phrases mocked these self-appointed Jewish leaders.

  • A blind guide is an oxymoron. A guide is meant to show you the way and not only show you the way but to teach and explain the way to you as well.
    A blind guide can do none of these.
  • Blind fools. Now here we’re getting really serious.

Did not Jesus say in Matthew 5:22

Matthew 5:22 ESV
22 But I say to you that everyone who is angry with his brother will be liable to judgment; whoever insults his brother will be liable to the council; and whoever says, ‘You fool!’ will be liable to the hell of fire.

Uh-oh! Now what do we do? Did Jesus sin by calling the Pharisees fools?
You see, there is such a thing as ungodly cursing and godly cursing.
There is such a thing as ungodly vulgarity and godly vulgarity.
There is such a thing as ungodly vows and godly vows.
There is such a thing as ungodly anger and godly anger.
And there is such a thing as ungodly name-calling and godly name-calling.
Jesus isn’t contradicting himself or sinning. Calling the religious leaders of the time ‘fools’ was the righteous thing to do because that’s what they were.
This is not the murderer’s selfish hatred for his brother where out of his rage he calls him ‘fool’.

  • Blind men – From guides to fools, now just as ordinary men – they are blind through and through.

Conclusion

The use of oaths is not a way for us to counteract the lack of trustworthiness in our regular words. It is a way of heightened emphasis that is meant to be used by the trustworthy man, who when he makes an oath, seals the listener’s assurance.
And going in order as we see it here in Matthew 23, hypocrisy affects our evangelism, in the way we convert people to our hypocrisy and now we see that it affects our vows.
A hypocrite is not a keeper of his word. He loiters on the edges of doctrinal plausibility to find glorious excuses to hide his sin.