Introduction

This is the word of the Lord,

2 Timothy 4:1–8 ESV

1 I charge you in the presence of God and of Christ Jesus, who is to judge the living and the dead, and by his appearing and his kingdom:
2 preach the word; be ready in season and out of season; reprove, rebuke, and exhort, with complete patience and teaching.
3 For the time is coming when people will not endure sound teaching, but having itching ears they will accumulate for themselves teachers to suit their own passions,
4 and will turn away from listening to the truth and wander off into myths.
5 As for you, always be sober-minded, endure suffering, do the work of an evangelist, fulfill your ministry.
6 For I am already being poured out as a drink offering, and the time of my departure has come.
7 I have fought the good fight, I have finished the race, I have kept the faith.
8 Henceforth there is laid up for me the crown of righteousness, which the Lord, the righteous judge, will award to me on that day, and not only to me but also to all who have loved his appearing.

Here, under the providence of God, we find ourselves having arrived at the long awaited Olivet Discourse as part of our expository series through the Gospel of Matthew.

In eight years of expository sermons, this would be the first time we unpack the subject of Eschatology (or the study of end times).

Now, although I’m eager to jump right into the fray of things, I believe that we must first lay the necessary groundwork in order to be able to build anything on top of it well.

This sermon and the next one will be a lot about context, background, what-to’s and what-not’s.

In any discourse, people come with their own set of assumptions, and it is often necessary to define terms and justify assumptions if we are to have hope of bearing any kind of fruit.

Problems with Eschatology

1. The subject of Eschatology is fraught with all kinds of confusions, and you often see people default to either of two extremes.

a. Either they want to have nothing to do with it.
I will speak of those who fall into this category a little further into the sermon.

b. Or they want to predict the fall of the stars and the next blood moon before the coming of the anti-Christ.

False teachers like John Hagee have created a large following by trying to predict the coming of Christ for years. Every red moon, he releases a new book.

If false teachers are wolves according to Scripture, men like Hagee are werewolves who come out every blood moon trying to usher in the eschaton.

The one thing you have to know about the end time is that every generation has been predicting it to happen for their own lifetime.

The anticipatory nature of this revelation can be quite addicting in a sense and many people are drawn to obsess over it in an unhealthy manner, and this has led many away from scripture into fantasy and conspiracy theories.

The Montanist Movement (2nd Century): Montanism was a heretical movement that emerged in the 2nd century, led by a man named Montanus, a prophet who claimed to receive direct revelations from the Holy Spirit.

Montanus prophesied the imminent return of Christ and the establishment of the New Jerusalem in the town of Pepuza in Phrygia (modern-day Turkey). Followers of Montanism engaged in ascetic practices, claimed to receive ecstatic visions, and rejected the authority of the institutional church.

The Anabaptist Kingdom of Münster (16th Century): In the 16th century, the city of Münster in Germany was briefly taken over by a radical Anabaptist sect known as the “Münster Anabaptists.” The leaders of the sect, Jan Matthys and Jan van Leiden, believed that Münster would become the New Jerusalem and that Christ’s return was imminent. They implemented strict religious laws and practices, including polygamy and the expulsion of non-believers.

They were eventually defeated by government forces and their leaders executed. The episode serves as a cautionary tale about the dangers of apocalyptic fervor leading to extremism and violence.

Millerite Movement (19th Century): The Millerite movement, led by William Miller in the 19th century, predicted that the Second Coming of Christ would occur in 1844 based on an interpretation of biblical prophecy. When this prediction failed to materialize, it led to what became known as the “Great Disappointment.” While many followers left the movement after the failed prophecy, some continued to hold on to their beliefs and formed various splinter groups, such as the Seventh-day Adventist Church.

Harold Camping’s Predictions (21st Century): Harold Camping, a Christian radio broadcaster, made multiple predictions about the end of the world based on his interpretation of biblical numerology. In 2011, he predicted that the Rapture would occur on May 21, followed by the end of the world on October 21 of the same year. When these predictions failed to materialize, it led to widespread criticism and disappointment among his followers.

So, as you can see, throughout history the religious fervour around eschatology has allured many to slip into a false-Christianity, one that does not glorify God.

Now, neither of these extremes, the utter disregard for the subject and the abject addiction of it, are biblical. Neither the unhinged obsession over the subject, nor the proud ignorance of it.

And the reason that there is so much confusion around this subject has to do with the nature of mystery.
We’ll unpack more on that as we move along.

2. Most churches rightly see this doctrine as either a second-order or a third-order doctrine, and therefore opening the doors for fellowship among Christians who disagree on this subject.

But often times, such categorisation or de-prioritisation has the collateral effect of creating the false impression that second-order and third-order doctrines are entirely avoidable.

Everything in scripture is important. God wrote it down for a reason and you and I have no business disregarding anything in the Bible.

• A thing that is most difficult for people to harmonise here is the unity in fellowship that must be maintained in the midst of a clear divide in conviction.

People are not so aware about how Christians can agree to disagree on certain things while flourishing in a healthy way.

3. The ambiguity of the text in general. This circles back to the nature of mystery. As much as the Bible reveals to us about what is to come, God does so sufficiently and not exhaustively.

For example, the Bible promises us that Jesus will return, but it does not tell us of the hour or day of Christ’s return.

The Bible does not speak about the end times as clearly perhaps as it speaks about justification by faith alone or the deity of Christ.

God has reserved an element of mystery to the subject of eschatology on purpose. But what is revealed is sufficient and Christians ought to pursue that sufficiency.

I am a Postmillennial!

Now, I am a preacher who surveys the horizon of our future based on the prophetic message of God’s word, who does not see the nearing of what is known as the great tribulation.

I am one among you who does not await the millennial rule of Christ, the 1000 years of Christ’s reign as foretold in Revelation 20.

I am one among you who does not believe that the world is wasting away in corruption, in a steady decline till the Jesus’ second coming.

I am one among you who does not believe that the future of the world hangs on the events surrounding the nation of Israel.

This is because, I believe that the consistent interpretation of Scripture reveals to us that the great tribulation has already past in the year AD 70.

I do not await the millennial rule of Christ, because I believe that we are presently living in the millennial rule of Christ.

I believe that when I pray as the Lord taught us, ‘Thy will be done on earth as it is in heaven’, this will be fulfilled in the here and now, ushering in through history, in God’s time, a world more and more sanctified by the Gospel – the Christianisation of the world.

I do not believe the Great Commission will fail in baptising nations unto Christ.

I am one among you who believes that the church has replaced national Israel as the true people of God, that the church is in all its essence the new-Israel.

I am in my conviction, a postmillennial. Some of you may be familiar with that term, and some of you may not be.

But as we begin this long awaited series on Eschatology (the study of the last things) as part of our expository series through the Gospel of Matthew, let me lay this out for you as plainly as I can.

You and I belong to an indoctrinating culture that has for the large part taught you that there is only one plausible view of the end times. That anything apart from imminent return of Jesus to rapture his church before the great tribulation, followed by the millennial rule of Christ; is a heresy.

Regardless of you denominational background, our cultural context has by and large had the same unified teaching on how the world would end.

Most Christians remain unaware of the diverse perspectives regarding the end times, let alone embrace them.

But they are wrong. There is more than one view of the end of time, that orthodox bible believing, born-again Christians have believed throughout history and continue to believe to this day.

And so our journey through Matthew 24, I hope will be at the very least a time of joyful learning and discovery.

What is Eschatology?

Eschatology is that branch of theology that deals with the study of the end times or the last things.

It is a subject wrought with theological debate and controversy. The reason for much of this debate has to do with the nature of prophecy. Because that is what we are dealing with.

The Greek word for the Book of Revelation is “Ἀποκάλυψις” (Apokalypsis), which translates to “Revelation” or “Unveiling.”

Theologians have interpreted the meaning of this unveiling and come to different views on how the world is going to come to an end.

Now, at this point many people will say that it is pointless to try and understand a subject that is open to so many interpretations. This takes us back to those first kind of people I spoke of earlier who consider discussions around this subject a waste of time.

But this would be a vain argument for two reasons,

i. There aren’t a gazillion interpretations. Reasonable analysis of Scripture at best renders a handful of interpretations.

ii. For a subject like Eschatology, the very word for Revelation is ‘unveiling’, not ‘obscuring’. When God unveils something, we ought not to be accusing him of obscuring.

The reason Christians should study and know about Eschatology has to do with the fact that God put the book of Revelation in Scripture. In other words, it is because God expects us to know, understand, teach and eagerly await his return.

How this series is structured

• Given the nature of this subject, I believe it to be prudent to take two weeks to lay the ground work that I believe is necessary before unpacking the Olivet discourse.

And in these two weeks, I want to talk about ‘Why Eschatology?’ and ‘How to approach the study of Eschatology’. We will do the first today and the second next week.

• Now, I want you to understand church, that this is a vast subject and it is not my intention to be exhaustive.

What this means is that it is highly possible, though not preferrable, that by the end of this series you may disagree with my position on this subject and hold to a different point of view and still be a member of this church.

Doug Wilson, who is a postmillennial, famously spoke of the end times theology as mid-air theology, because if he was wrong and Jesus did return now to rapture his people, he would be caught up in the clouds and would be more than happy to change his theological view mid-air.

Exegesis – Why Eschatology?

Why should we study the subject of the apocalypse? Apart from the few reasons I mentioned earlier, I wanted this Scripture portion in 2 Timothy 4 to weigh on your hearts.

I don’t want us to study this subject for any vain reason, but the central purpose for why I believe the revelation of the prophecy of the end times has been given to us. And we see it here in 2 Timothy 4.

2 Timothy 4:1 ESV

1 I charge you in the presence of God and of Christ Jesus, who is to judge the living and the dead, and by his appearing and his kingdom:

• The Apostle Paul issues a charge, a solemn command to his disciple Timothy, his spiritual son whom he dearly loved.

• And this charge he give sin the presence of God and of Christ Jesus. This is a trinitarian charge, an appeal to the Most High to bless this charge.

Paul charging Timothy in the presence of God and of Christ Jesus here is akin to God issuing the charge himself because in this picture, Paul is only working as the instrument of God.

• This God is judge of both the living and the dead. He is judge of past, present and future. All men in all history will stand before this judge.

• Now, this charge is also issued on the foundation of his appearing. The word appearing is talking about a fitting manifestation of Christ’s glory in his final appearing. What Christians refer to as the second-coming of Christ.

Paul is laying the context of his charge to Timothy. And the context is the triune God who will appear to judge the living and the dead, and his kingdom will be fully realised.

In view of this context, Paul lays this charge on Timothy.

To do what?

2 Timothy 4:2 ESV

2 preach the word; be ready in season and out of season; reprove, rebuke, and exhort, with complete patience and teaching.

• The preaching of the word then is an activity that is issued from an eschatological context. A preacher who does not bother with the appearing of Christ lays himself a different context than the one Scripture lays for him.

• He is to be ready in season and out of season. This is not a seasonal charge. It does not present itself in the summer and then fall off in the winter.

This constant readiness comes from a constant awareness of the second coming of Christ.

Timothy preached the word that would manifest himself again in his second coming. He preached in and out of season moving ever closer to the returning Christ.

• This is a charge of discipleship that covers more than just preaching. He is to preach, reprove, rebuke and exhort.

Spiritual discipline or godly correction has to come from an eschatological mindset. The appearing of Christ must be in the forefront of the mind that rebukes.

The more you study about the subject of Eschatology, it is interesting how pervasive it is, ingrained into the fabric of the Christian faith.

• He is to do all this with complete patience and teaching. That is very interesting don’t you think?

One would assume that the anticipatory nature of second coming should naturally make one more pushy or hasty. Yet, in this expectation of Christ’s return, Timothy is to exercise not some, or a little, but complete patience.

This, for me, does not comport with an imminent eschaton or an imminent return of Christ. That would require haste.

At the very least, in this text Paul does not urge an imminent return but rather urges all patience expecting a sure return.

2 Timothy 4:3–4 ESV

3 For the time is coming when people will not endure sound teaching, but having itching ears they will accumulate for themselves teachers to suit their own passions,
4 and will turn away from listening to the truth and wander off into myths.

• This was a reality during Paul’s time. Why then does he say that the time is coming? I think he’s specifically talking about Timothy’s context as an elder in Ephesus.

I think this because this has been true not only of Paul’s time or Timothy’s time but of every time since, that people will not endure sound teaching. This is something to be expected.

• That people will not endure the fulfilment of Timothy’s charge. He is to preach the word that they would not endure.

And they would rather accumulate for themselves teachers to suit their passion, wandering off into myths.

Like Harold Camping and the many eschatological cults?

• A healthy eschatology is a thoroughly biblical eschatology, and man who truly preaches the word, and a people who love the truth that is preached, will all develop a healthy eschatology although they may differ with one another on many of the specifics.

But a people who reject the truth of the word preached, are those who reject truth surrounding the second coming of Christ.

They who reject Paul’s charge to Timothy because their itching ears want to hear something else, are those that will inevitably reject the eschatological context from which that charge was given.

2 Timothy 4:5 ESV

5 As for you, always be sober-minded, endure suffering, do the work of an evangelist, fulfill your ministry.

• As for you – is a contrast that Paul now draws between those who reject sound doctrine and Timothy.

The charge continues.

• Be sober-minded. Sober mindedness is a result of orthodoxy. It comes from a cleaving to sound doctrine. A deviation from the word makes one delusional.

• Endure suffering. Is this not one of the most itches in people’s ears, of a promise of a false comfort that rejects the hard road of righteousness?

One of the charges that Paul gives to Timothy is to endure suffering. Not to escape it. And this endurance is born from the same eschatological context.

Much of the hope in a Christian’s suffering comes from the hope of Christ’s appearing.

• Evangelise. The work of an evangelist is to gather all to the appearing of Christ.

Few things are more affected than evangelism when it comes to the eschatological position one holds. We will see more of this next week.

• Fulfil your ministry. Timothy is to fulfil all that God has called him to by holding fast to the appearing of Christ.

2 Timothy 4:6–7 ESV

6 For I am already being poured out as a drink offering, and the time of my departure has come.
7 I have fought the good fight, I have finished the race, I have kept the faith.

• For – the reason for this official charge by Paul has an added context. His time has come.

• This charge comes from one who has himself fulfilled the charge from Christ.

Fought the good fight – Paul beckons Timothy to fight like he fought, recognising the worthy or the good fight, and such a fight is fought in an eschatological context.

Finished the race – The race is run in an eschatological context

Kept the faith – The faith is kept in an eschatological context.

Now, if you feel that I’m stretching the text to fit the eschatological narrative, here is why I think Paul has the appearing of Christ in mind throughout this charge.

Here’s the next verse.

2 Timothy 4:8 ESV

8 Henceforth there is laid up for me the crown of righteousness, which the Lord, the righteous judge, will award to me on that day, and not only to me but also to all who have loved his appearing.

• Henceforth – Paul concludes his charge with a view to the eschaton.

• A crown which the righteous judge will reward on that day. The reward of the righteous in the honour that Christ will bestow on all his children.

• This crown is given to all who what? – loved his appearing.

This appearing is not merely anticipated or taught. It is loved. It is treasured. It is hoped for.

Conclusion

When will Jesus return? When is his second coming? How can we love his appearing? How can we hope and live in the hope of his appearing? What does the future hold?

Unto these things, we will turn our minds in the coming weeks.

The intention of this series is not to be exhaustive but to unpack the manner and time of his appearing.

I will do this primarily from a postmillennial standpoint. That means that there will be a lot of questions that you may have, and we have made provision for that.

And I will try my best to address every one of them.

But in this journey, we are above all things, regardless of the timing and understanding of the events, we are all to love his appearing.